Democratizing intelligence

6 October 2015

140 characters in self-invented acronym language are enough to get your message across to the relevant #conversation communities and everyone knows @who is talking.

If you aim to write a proper sentence in a blog, spellcheck corrects your language, but your personal expression is your identity. If you receive, or want to send, something in a foreign language you just turn Google translate on. The days Latin and fine-writing separated the achievers from the rest is history. Nothing can stop you from tweeting at, or about, your local MP or celebrity, and they might even reply. Information has become current text conversation. Newspaper reading is in decline, but people are more informed. Voter turn-out has increased each time for the last 4 elections since 2001, up 10 per cent. Mobile texting has significantly reduced illiteracy in the least developing countries and revolutions are led through Facebook.

It’s a new brave world! However, it comes with challenges and opportunities for business and society.

Somebody needs to write the new software codes and develop sense-making via data analytics. So far we have looked to America and Silicon Valley to lead the way. The UK has a shortage of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics talent, and too much of the curriculum is backward looking.

Computer scientists are not developing their knowledge into global business models. If a successful entrepreneur in the new space wants to match opportunity with action, our financial system (preoccupied with less risky buy-to-let property markets) is not capable of finding solutions to back high-tech SMEs rich in intellectual property with growth finance. This gap hinders virtuous cycles of achieving national excellence in literacy and programming skills.

Businesses are also looking for softer skills in co-creators and open innovators. They are investing a historical high in processes and people. In the UK, they invest double what they do in physical machinery, buildings andraw materials. But they start from a very low base. Whereas the new forms of text speak and big data enable user-driven innovations through consumers, we are falling short in creating the high-level interdisciplinary and
cross-occupational skills which are so important in the new smarter economy. And if we think this is a challenge for big companies, it is even greater for SMEs, where resource constraints and traditions lead to narrowfocus and low tech. On top of all this, university academics cannot communicate their research findings with people who are not super-skilled in their field. Businesses report them as poor co-creators.

Knowledge has become a key commodity, but there is no marketplace where we can trade ideas, designs, and creative expressions (as we can for capital, labour, property, and land). Here we rely on lawyers to write the overly complex and very expensive contracts in an incomprehensible legal language.

Do our MPs understand the opportunities and challenges?

Birgitte Andersen, Chief Executive Officer and CoCreator, Big Innovation Centre

This article was written for the Reform Annual Journal to accompany the Conservative Party Conference event “Words for life: how better literacy improves lives”.



No comments yet.