- Our Work
- The Reformer Blog
Rarely have the conditions been more favourable than when Labour began its welfare reform programme in 1997:
The New Deal programme is very much the Chancellor’s brain child. Gordon Brown’s laudable ambition has been to make life on benefit a thing of the past.
The results of the New Deal for Young People have however been modest, to put it mildly. Some young people have been found work, but the vast majority of them would have done so without the New Deal. Moreover the number and proportion of young people finding work as a result of their New Deal has collapsed from 51 per cent in 1998 to 34 per cent in 2005.
In a recent speech, the Employment and Welfare Reform Minister, Jim Murphy, claimed that “youth unemployment has been virtually abolished”. The figures disprove this statement.
Youth unemployment is higher than when Labour was elected in 1997, and rising;
A third of New Deal programmes are now completed by retreads and the proportion of young people on the New Deal has fallen as a proportion of the numbers claiming benefit.
The numbers not in education, employment or training (NEETs) are similarly on the rise: up 246,000 on the low point recorded in summer 2001, and up 131,000 above the level Labour inherited in 1997.
Inactivity of 18 to 24 year olds shows a similar trend: up 283,000 on the 1997 level inherited by Labour.
More of the same will not work.
A key part of Labour’s renewal in government has to be to take its youth employment strategy back to the drawing board. More of the same will not work, even if the money was available to continue to finance the New Deal. The New Deal, so far, has had only a modest impact on unemployment, on the numbers not in education, employment or training, and therefore the numbers recorded as inactive. Part of the Government’s renewal must be to begin to construct a more effective New Deal for the future.PDF DOWNLOAD